Canon EOS R5 vs Sony a7R IV
When it comes to choosing a high-performance mirrorless camera, both the Canon EOS R5 and the Sony a7R IV stand out as top contenders. These cameras offer a wealth of features that cater to both professional photographers and serious enthusiasts. In this detailed comparison, we will examine the key parameters that potential buyers consider when deciding between these two exceptional models. Lets dive into Canon EOS R5 vs Sony a7R IV.
Also See:Â Nikon Z8 vs Z6 II
Also See: Canon EOS R5 vs Nikon Z8
Canon EOS R5 vs Sony a7R IV – Comparison Table
| Feature | Canon EOS R5 | Sony a7R IV |
|---|---|---|
| Design | ||
| TYPE | Mirrorless | Mirrorless |
| VIEWFINDER | Electronic viewfinder (EVF) | Electronic viewfinder (EVF) |
| IS WEATHER-SEALED (SPLASHPROOF) | ✔ | ✔ |
| SCREEN RESOLUTION | 2100k dots | 1440k dots |
| EVF RESOLUTION | 5760k dots | Unknown |
| HAS A BUILT-IN FOCUS MOTOR | ✖ | ✔ |
| HAS A FLIP-OUT SCREEN | ✔ | ✔ |
| VIEWFINDER COVERAGE | 100% | 100% |
| SCREEN SIZE | 3.2″ | 3″ |
| WEIGHT | 738 g | 665 g |
| HAS A TOUCH SCREEN | ✔ | ✔ |
| HAS A HOT SHOE | ✔ | ✔ |
| VOLUME | 1190.11 cm³ | 965.95 cm³ |
| IS A SYSTEM CAMERA | ✔ | ✔ |
| HAS A FLASH | ✖ | ✖ |
| LOWEST POTENTIAL OPERATING TEMPERATURE | 0 °C | Unknown |
| MAXIMUM OPERATING TEMPERATURE | 40 °C | Unknown |
| HAS A TILTING VIEWFINDER | ✖ | ✔ |
| EVF REFRESH RATE (MAX) | 120fps | Unknown |
| WATERPROOF DEPTH RATING | Unknown | Unknown |
| WIDTH | 138 mm | 129 mm |
| HEIGHT | 98 mm | 96 mm |
| THICKNESS | 88 mm | 78 mm |
| Optics | ||
| SENSOR SIZE | Full frame | Full frame |
| LENS MOUNT | Canon RF | Sony E |
| FOCUS POINTS | 5940 | 567 |
| MEGAPIXELS (MAIN CAMERA) | 45 MP | 61 MP |
| MAXIMUM ISO | 51200 ISO | 32000 ISO |
| MAXIMUM EXPANDED ISO | 102400 ISO | 102800 ISO |
| HAS SENSOR SHIFT STABILIZATION | ✔ | ✔ |
| CONTINUOUS SHOOTING (MECHANICAL) | 20 fps | 10 fps |
| HAS AF TRACKING | ✔ | ✔ |
| HAS PHASE-DETECTION AUTOFOCUS FOR PHOTOS | ✔ | ✔ |
| FASTEST SHUTTER SPEED | 1/8000 s | 1/8000 s |
| HAS MANUAL FOCUS | ✔ | ✔ |
| HAS TOUCH AUTOFOCUS | ✔ | ✔ |
| HAS MANUAL SHUTTER SPEED | ✔ | ✔ |
| HAS A BUILT-IN HDR MODE | ✔ | ✔ |
| HAS A BSI SENSOR | ✖ | ✔ |
| HAS MANUAL EXPOSURE | ✔ | ✔ |
| HAS A TWO-STAGE SHUTTER | ✔ | ✔ |
| HAS A SERIAL SHOT MODE | ✔ | ✔ |
| HAS A CMOS SENSOR | ✔ | ✔ |
| HAS MANUAL ISO | ✔ | ✔ |
| FLASH SYNC SPEED | 1/200 s | 1/250 s |
| HAS MANUAL WHITE BALANCE | ✔ | ✔ |
| CAN CREATE PANORAMAS IN-CAMERA | ✔ | ✔ |
| EXPOSURE TIME | 30 s | 30 s |
| MAXIMUM ELECTRONIC SHUTTER SPEED | 1/8000 s | Unknown |
| SHUTTER LAG | Unknown | Unknown |
| EXPEED VERSION | ∅ | Unknown |
| DIGIC VERSION | Unknown | Unknown |
| HAS A STACKED CMOS SENSOR | ✖ | ✖ |
| CROSS-TYPE FOCUS POINTS | Unknown | Unknown |
| POWER-ON DELAY | Unknown | Unknown |
| PIXEL SIZE (MAIN CAMERA) | Unknown | Unknown |
| IMAGE STABILIZATION RATING (CIPA) | 8 stops | Unknown |
| CAN COMBINE IMAGE STABILIZATION | ✔ | ✖ |
| Videography | ||
| VIDEO RECORDING (MAIN CAMERA) | 4320 x 30 fps | 2160 x 30 fps |
| HAS PHASE-DETECTION AUTOFOCUS FOR VIDEOS | ✔ | ✔ |
| HAS CONTINUOUS AUTOFOCUS WHEN RECORDING MOVIES | ✔ | ✔ |
| HAS A MICROPHONE INPUT | ✔ | ✔ |
| HAS A SOCKET FOR A 3.5 MM AUDIO JACK | ✔ | ✔ |
| HAS A STEREO MICROPHONE | ✖ | ✔ |
| HAS TIMELAPSE FUNCTION | ✔ | ✔ |
| MOVIE BITRATE | 2600 Mbps | 100 Mbps |
| NUMBER OF MICROPHONES | 1 | 2 |
| HAS A 24P CINEMA MODE | ✔ | ✔ |
| SUPPORTS SLOW-MOTION VIDEO RECORDING | ✔ | ✔ |
| Battery | ||
| BATTERY LIFE (CIPA) | 320 shots | 670 shots |
| HAS A REMOVABLE BATTERY | ✔ | ✔ |
| HAS A RECHARGEABLE BATTERY | ✔ | ✔ |
| HAS A BATTERY LEVEL INDICATOR | ✔ | ✔ |
| BATTERY POWER | Unknown | Unknown |
| Features | ||
| SUPPORTS WI-FI | ✔ | ✔ |
| HAS BLUETOOTH | ✔ | ✔ |
| HAS DUAL CARD SLOTS | ✔ | ✔ |
| HAS PIXEL SHIFT SHOT | ✖ | ✔ |
| SHOOTS RAW | ✔ | ✔ |
| SUPPORTS LOSSLESS COMPRESSED RAW | ✔ | ✖ |
| WI-FI VERSION | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac), Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n) | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac), Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n) |
| SUPPORTS A REMOTE SMARTPHONE | ✔ | ✔ |
| HAS AN HDMI OUTPUT | ✔ | ✔ |
| HAS GPS | ✖ | ✖ |
| HAS FIRST-PARTY SUPPORT FOR LIVE STREAMING | ✖ | ✖ |
| HAS AN ADVANCED HOT SHOE | ✖ | ✖ |
| DXOMARK SENSOR SCORE | 95 | 99 |
| DXOMARK SPORTS SCORE | 3042 ISO | 3344 ISO |
| DXOMARK LANDSCAPE SCORE | 14.6 EV | 14.8 EV |
| DXOMARK PORTRAIT SCORE | 25.3 bits | 26 bits |
| USB VERSION | Unknown | 3.1 |
| HDMI VERSION | Unknown | HDMI 2.0 |
| HAS NFC | ✖ | ✔ |
| HAS AN EXTERNAL MEMORY SLOT | ✔ | ✔ |
| INTERNAL STORAGE | Unknown | Unknown |
| HAS USB TYPE-C | ✔ | ✔ |
| BLUETOOTH VERSION | 5 | 4.1 |
Design and Build Quality
The Canon EOS R5 and the Sony a7R IV are both mirrorless cameras, providing the latest in camera technology within a compact form factor. Both models feature an electronic viewfinder (EVF), essential for real-time previews of your shots. Weather sealing is another crucial aspect, and both cameras are splashproof, ensuring durability in various shooting conditions.
In terms of screen resolution, the Canon EOS R5 boasts a higher resolution with 2100k dots compared to the Sony a7R IV’s 1440k dots. This higher resolution screen on the EOS R5 allows for sharper image review and better menu visibility. Additionally, the EVF resolution on the EOS R5 is significantly higher at 5760k dots, offering a clearer viewfinder image than the Sony a7R IV, which lacks a specified value.
Size and Weight
The weight of a camera can influence its portability and ease of use during extended shoots. The Sony a7R IV is lighter at 665 grams, compared to the Canon EOS R5, which weighs 738 grams. For photographers who prioritize a lightweight setup, the a7R IV may be the preferable option. However, the EOS R5’s slightly larger body might provide a more substantial grip and better balance with heavier lenses.
Optical Performance
Sensor size is a critical factor in determining image quality. Both cameras feature full-frame sensors, which are known for their superior image quality, especially in low-light conditions. The Canon EOS R5 has 45 megapixels, while the Sony a7R IV offers a higher resolution of 61 megapixels. This makes the a7R IV an excellent choice for photographers who need extremely high-resolution images, such as landscape or commercial photographers.
The maximum ISO performance of the Canon EOS R5 reaches 51200, allowing for greater sensitivity in low-light situations. The Sony a7R IV has a lower maximum ISO of 32000. However, the a7R IV compensates with an expanded ISO range reaching up to 102800, slightly surpassing the R5’s expanded range of 102400.
Autofocus and Shooting Speed
Autofocus capability is another key differentiator. The Canon EOS R5 features an impressive 5940 focus points, providing extensive coverage and precision. In comparison, the Sony a7R IV has 567 focus points, which, while fewer, still offer robust performance. Continuous shooting speed is also crucial for action and wildlife photography. The EOS R5 excels with a mechanical shutter speed of 20 fps, doubling the a7R IV’s 10 fps.
Video Capabilities
For videographers, the Canon EOS R5 offers superior video recording capabilities with a maximum resolution of 4320 x 30 fps (8K). The Sony a7R IV, while still capable, supports a lower resolution of 2160 x 30 fps (4K). The higher bitrate of the EOS R5 at 2600 Mbps compared to the a7R IV’s 100 Mbps ensures better video quality with more detail and less compression.
Battery Life
Battery life is essential for long shooting sessions. The Sony a7R IV offers a substantial advantage with a battery life of 670 shots, compared to the Canon EOS R5’s 320 shots. This difference can be significant for photographers who spend long hours in the field without access to charging facilities.
Additional Features
Both cameras support Wi-Fi and Bluetooth, facilitating easy image transfer and remote control via smartphones. However, the Canon EOS R5 features Bluetooth 5.0, offering faster and more stable connections compared to the a7R IV’s Bluetooth 4.1. The a7R IV, on the other hand, includes NFC, providing an additional method for quick device pairing.
Choosing between the Canon EOS R5 and the Sony a7R IV ultimately depends on your specific needs and preferences. The EOS R5 excels in video performance, autofocus capabilities, and screen resolution, making it a versatile choice for both photographers and videographers. The a7R IV, with its higher megapixel count, lighter weight, and longer battery life, is ideal for photographers who prioritize image resolution and extended shooting sessions. Both models are outstanding in their own right, ensuring that you can’t go wrong with either choice.
Also See:
Nikon Z6 II vs Nikon Z5 – Comprehensive Comparison
11 Types of Lenses for Mirrorless Cameras
——————————————————————————————————————————————Â
Techcazt, Tech Magazine. We provide you with the latest news, reviews, and insights on the most cutting-edge technology available today. Whether you’re a hardcore gamer, a tech enthusiast, or just looking for great deals on your favorite gadgets, we’ve got you covered. The articles published in our magazine are intended to provide general information and ideas related to Tech and related topics. We strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, but readers should always conduct their own research and consult with professionals before making decisions. If you have any comments or suggestions, please comment below. You can also follow us on Facebook, Instagram, and Twitter. Do not forget to give us a LIKE and SUBSCRIBE
